BananaNL Blog

AI Chat / 4 min

AI Chat prompts: what to change across NotebookLM, Gemini, ChatGPT, and Grok

A practical guide to AI Chat prompts that shows how the same source note should be asked differently in NotebookLM, Gemini, ChatGPT, and Grok.

The same note does not need the same prompt everywhere

A common prompt mistake is pasting the same wording into every AI tool. The result is often a stack of similar summaries with no clear reason to choose one tool over another.

NotebookLM is strong at source-based organization. Gemini is useful for improving presentation. ChatGPT is good for rewrites and draft directions. Grok is useful for comparisons and next questions.

Once you decide the output shape first, the prompt can stay short and still be practical.

Abstract image of one note turning into different outputs by AI tool

What to change by tool

  1. Pick one source note, memo, or document.
  2. Decide the output shape first: summary, comparison table, explanation, or next questions.
  3. Ask only for the role that tool is good at.
  4. Add one clear constraint such as beginner-friendly, three bullets, or no text.

Prompt switching pattern

SourceOutputToolConstraint

What to ask from each AI

NotebookLMTurn source material into a beginner-friendly summary, slide outline, or infographic structure.
GeminiImprove presentation while reading document or image context.
ChatGPTRewrite explanations, shape outlines, or draft notes for image generation.
GrokTurn notes into comparison tables, issue maps, and next questions.

Prompt examples from the same source

NotebookLM for first-pass organization

Organize this source so a first-time reader can understand it in one page. Use this order: conclusion, three key points, and next action. Keep headings short.

It fixes the output shape that NotebookLM handles well.

Gemini for presentation cleanup

Improve this material for internal sharing. Use generous spacing, short headings, surface the key number first, and point out what explanation is still missing.

It combines visual cleanup with gap finding.

ChatGPT for explanation and handoff

Rewrite this for a non-specialist reader. Put the conclusion first, replace difficult terms, and end with a three-line composition note that could guide image generation next.

It gets a clearer explanation and a useful next-step draft.

Grok for comparison and follow-up

Turn this into a comparison table. Use columns for what it does, who it fits, weaknesses, and what should be checked next. End with three follow-up questions.

It prevents research notes from stopping at summary.

If searching for prompts is the hard part, use BananaNL

Once you keep slightly different prompt patterns for each AI, repeated searching, copying, and pasting becomes friction.

BananaNL inserts selected prompts into AI input fields and does not auto-send. NotebookLM use starts free, while AI Chat integrations such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok are paid features.

Abstract image of tool-specific prompts kept near the input field

FAQ

Can I reuse the exact same prompt everywhere?

You can, but small changes to the output format usually make each tool more useful.

Does BananaNL auto-send the prompt?

No. It only inserts the selected prompt into the input field so you can review it first.

What is free vs paid?

NotebookLM use starts free. AI Chat integrations are paid features.

If searching for prompts is the hard part, use BananaNL

Prompts become useful when they are close to the input field. Use BananaNL to carry them there, then adjust before sending.